Mar
25
2011
3

Elissa Dommel – Chapter 25-28

1. The fact that Mark contemplates suicide is justifiable, given his past, but suicide seems like an extreme thing for a child his age to consider. It’s hard to imagine life being so horrible that you want to end it at ten years old. But, Mark has been through many hard times. He has witnessed murder and prostitution, been abused constantly at school, and has had to live in poverty for his entire life. Even though both of Mark’s parents have jobs, he feels that there is no way out of his situation.

If Mark were older, his situation would be a bit more justifiable. But, since he is only ten years old and still has a lot of his life ahead of him, suicide shouldn’t be the answer to his problems. Since Mark is going to school and learning how to read and write, his future could be better than his current situation. Since he has an education, he will probably have a better adulthood than his parents do. Mark should have thought about his future before contemplating suicide.

2. Chapter 28, page 169 – ” “Will you miss me too, Mama?” I sobbed. She held me tighter and said: “I would miss you more than anyone else. I too would want to die if you were to die. You’re the only hope I have. I love you very much.” I continued weeping. The tears seemed to want to come out. I felt deeply ashamed and guilty of some unknown wrong. “Now give me that knife,” I heard my mother say. I couldn’t see her because my eyes were now swimming in tears. I extended my hand and opened my palm, and she took the knife.”

In my opinion, this passage is the most significant because what Mark’s mother says in this passage stops him from committing suicide. For the first time in the book, Mark’s mother tells him how much she loves him and how glad she is to have him. Mark then knows that he would be greatly missed if he died, and doesn’t commit suicide.

3. Why does Mark’s mother keep having children when she knows that there won’t be enough money and food to support such a large family?

Written by Elissa Dommel in: Uncategorized |
Mar
14
2011
2

Dystopian Society: Elissa Dommel

1) In my opinion, a dystopian society is presented more effectively through a non-fiction text. When a dystopian society is presented in a non-fiction text, it is actually a true dystopian society that exists/has existed, and nothing is being made up. The facts about the dystopian society described are true. This is the case in Kaffir Boy. In Kaffir Boy, the society in which the characters live is not made up. The family actually had to live in a shack, sleep on cardboard, and feed on insects and animal’s blood. I feel that I can picture the events more easily knowing that they actually occurred and were endured by people. Kaffir Boy gives an extremely effective description of a real life dystopia.

Though a dystopian society can be effectively presented in a fiction text as well, the information and details given about the society are not true, and sometimes readers may have a difficult time believing or picturing them. For example, in Harrison Bergeron, a society in which the government demands equality by placing disabilities on people seems unreal. Though this is a excellent example of a dystopic society, it’s almost so unreal that it’s difficult to picture occurring. I find it more effective if the dystopian society actually existed, and is not only a story.

After reading posts by others and reading the comments, I still feel that I was on the right track by stating that a dystopian society is presented more effectively in a non-fiction text. Certain details in a fiction text may be too far fetched, but details in a non-fiction text are true facts. Reading the comments from Olivia and Tess made my view on this situation even stronger.

Written by Elissa Dommel in: Uncategorized |

Powered by WordPress | Aeros Theme | TheBuckmaker.com WordPress Themes